Editorial Policy

Toronto Biztech should be useful before it is persuasive.

Every guide, comparison, and resource should explain assumptions, tradeoffs, dates, and the type of company the advice fits.

Standards

• Use direct language and practical examples.
• Date-sensitive claims need a visible review date.
• Product comparisons should explain fit, and should avoid pretending one tool wins for everyone.
• Regional pages need local evidence. City-name swaps are not enough.
• Vendor capability claims that we have not tested are attributed to the vendor and labelled as such.
• Where a primary source exists, cite it. Product behaviour should be sourced to the vendor’s own documentation.

Disclosures

• Sponsorships, affiliate relationships, paid placements, and referral relationships must be disclosed on the page where they apply.
• Links arising from a commercial or referral relationship are marked with rel="sponsored".
• A disclosed relationship does not change the standards above. Findings that can be checked against a primary source should be checked against it.

Corrections

When a factual issue is found, the page should be updated. Material corrections should include a short note explaining what changed. See Corrections for how that process works.